Mirad esta propuesta de los antimilis quáqueros de Ucrania.
No estoy de acuerdo, pero es interesante: Acceso a la OTAN pero firmando el
TPAN.
Estas conversaciones de paz podrían incluir la introducción de un alto el
fuego, la membresía en la OTAN como garantía de seguridad para Ucrania, la
neutralidad nuclear (adhesión al Tratado sobre la Prohibición de las Armas
Nucleares) de Ucrania y el compromiso de la OTAN de permitir la neutralidad
nuclear de los miembros de la alianza como garantía de seguridad para
Rusia, y la disposición de ambas partes a resolver su disputa territorial
por medios pacíficos.
Abrazos,
Quique Sánchez Ochoa
Tècnic de Projectes (ell / he)Centre Delàs d’Estudis per la Pau
qsanchez@centredelas.org https://afamontseny.com/
C/ Bisbe Laguarda 4, Baixos, Local 208001 Barcelona | 93 441 19 47
www.centredelas.or http://www.centredelas.org/g | www.bancaarmada.org |
www.pacifist.app https://pacifist.app/ | www.demilitarize.org
Tota la informació continguda en aquest missatge és de caràcter
confidencial. Si vostè no és el destinatari d'aquest correu i ha rebut
aquest missatge per error, li preguem que ho comuniqui immediatament per
mitjà d'aquesta mateixa via i procedeixi a la seva destrucció. Protecció de
dades: L’informem que Associació Centre d’Estudis per la Pau JM Delàs, com
a Responsable de les seves dades personals, tractarà aquestes amb la
finalitat d’atendre les seves sol·licituds d’informació i missatges,
legitimats pel consentiment inequívoc que vostè ens proporciona en posar-se
en contacte amb nosaltres i ens sol·licita una resposta. Tanmateix,
l'informem que no cedirem les seves dades a tercers. Si desitja exercir els
seus drets d'accés, rectificació, supressió, portabilitat, limitació del
tractament i d’oposició, pot posar-se en contacte amb nosaltres. Trobarà
més informació sobre les nostres polítiques de protecció de dades a la
nostra pàgina centredelas.org.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
De: Jordi Calvo Rufanges
Date: dt., 10 de des. 2024 a les 6:15
Subject: Fwd: Peace in Ukraine Needs Christmas Ceasefire and Nuclear
Neutrality, Quakers Suggest
To: Grup Delàs
Bon dia,
És interessant llegir aquest article de Yuri, antimilitarista quacker
ucrainés, de l'IPB, per entendre per on sembla que van els posicionaments
pacifistes a Ucraïna, obrint la porta a l'entrada a l'OTAN... en podem
parlar una mica a la reunió d'avui si us sembla bé.
Abraçada
j
*Peace in Ukraine Needs Christmas Ceasefire and Nuclear Neutrality, Quakers
Suggest*
*By Yurii Sheliazhenko, World BEYOND War, December 9, 2024*
*Source: https://worldbeyondwar.org/peace-in-ukraine-needs-christmas-ceasefire-and-nu...
https://worldbeyondwar.org/peace-in-ukraine-needs-christmas-ceasefire-and-nu...*
*After more than a thousand days of internationally condemned Russian
full-scale invasion of Ukraine and more than a million casualties, the
senseless war in Ukraine must end.*
*Ukrainian Quakers proposed that a Christmas truce could be introduced to
start peace talks the sooner the better, hopefully between 25 December and
7 January, the days when Christmas is celebrated in Ukraine and Russia. “We
pray for peace and justice” – was said in the ministry
https://friends.org.ua/482.*
*Such peace talks could include introduction of ceasefire, NATO membership
as a security guarantee for Ukraine, nuclear neutrality (accession to the
Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons) of Ukraine and commitment of
NATO to allow nuclear neutrality for members of the alliance as security
guarantees to Russia, and readiness on both sides to resolve their
territorial dispute by peaceful means.*
Public opinion polls both in Russia and Ukraine show support for peace
talks, but also strong popular support of incompatible positions held by
both governments. However, many people are unwilling to fight war for the
radical demands of their governments. Millions fled Russia and Ukraine in
order not to be forcibly mobilized into a meat grinder. The Russian
government declared people to be “foreign agents” and relentlessly
repressed conscientious objectors to military service and antiwar
activists. Ukraine imprisons objectors, abducts men of age 18-60 on streets
and forcibly transports them to recruitment centers, where those who refuse
to fight war are treated inhumanely with several reported cases of death in
custody. Desertion is pandemic in the Russian and Ukrainian armies.
Russia insists that Ukraine must give up occupied territories and
aspirations of NATO membership. There are controversial claims that
Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine were historically populated by
Russians, and counter-claims that Russian colonial politics and denial of
the existence of Ukraine as an independent nation have no legitimate
grounds in international law.
Ukraine refuses to cede officially any territories and sees NATO membership
as the only viable security guarantee that could prevent further Russian
attacks, though Ukraine (according to President Zelenskyy’s interview to
Sky News) is ready not to pursue regaining Russia-occupied territories by
force, self-restraining to diplomatic efforts, in exchange for an
invitation to NATO with no Article 5 guarantees related to Russia-occupied
territories.
While these positions are fixed as non-negotiable, the Russian offensive
gradually expands its occupied territories of Ukraine, and the Ukrainian
counter-offensive has captured a small part of the Russian mainland, which
some propagandists in Ukraine call historical Ukrainian lands.
The war escalated with a Russian hypersonic intermediate-range ballistic
missile being fired at the Ukrainian city of Dnipro in a clear nuclear
threat, when the government of Ukraine obtained from the United States and
other Western governments permission to use their weapons supplies for
long-range strikes into Russia after alleged military involvement of North
Korea on the Russian side.
Asserting Ukrainian NATO membership ambitions as non-negotiable while
President-elect Trump signaled willingness to prevent that from happening
as a bargaining chip for President Putin, President Zelensky signaled that
denial of what he says is the only real strategic security guarantee that
the West might offer could make Ukraine reconsider a decision to give up
nuclear weapons made in the 1990s.
The dangerous informal signals that Ukraine could realistically regain
nuclear weapons if not allowed to join NATO are already used by the Kremlin
to justify escalation of its nuclear blackmail, though these signals are
officially dismissed by statements that Ukraine complies with its
non-proliferation obligations. However, being one of the countries with the
lowest fear of nuclear war in the world, as polls reveal, Ukraine seemingly
has some radicals among its ruling elite who tend to be reckless in
asserting that “we will have NATO nuclear umbrella or home-made nukes”.
After Trump’s hawkish foreign policy nomination proposals, including a UN
ambassador nominee who supported NATO membership of Ukraine in 2022, with
public exchanges in the media between Trump’s and Putin’s men that suggest
a “peace trough strength” approach and a lack of willingness to make
tradeoffs on both sides, it is possible that the “24-hour peace” plan of
President-elect Trump will lead to quick rejection of his offer by the
Kremlin and a subsequent increase of military support to Ukraine, not
ruling out even nuclear saber-rattling.
Prevention of nuclear war between NATO and Russia, and survival of
humankind requires that an end to the Russian war of aggression be made in
a peaceful and fair way, not “freezing” the war but starting a genuine
reconciliation process. Toward that end, transformations in the world
security architecture are needed, and a spirit of change is already moving
in the air with discussions of necessary reforms of NATO and the UN.
The most important change needed is to make NATO less threatening to
Russia, where it is currently perceived as a hostile nuclear alliance. The
experience of war in Ukraine shows that NATO could help Ukraine in a
defensive war by conventional means, without nuclear deterrence. This
careful reduction of the nuclear threat could be a basis for a long-term
settlement with Russia, even if NATO will not abandon its so-called
“open-door policy” that annoys the Kremlin.
Of course, it would be ideal to disband NATO along with all military
alliances and armies in the world, scrap all nukes and conventional
weapons, and give the UN more powers and resources to strengthen nonviolent
global governance and peaceful conflict resolution. However, in absence of
proper peace education, the majority of people almost everywhere still put
their trust into armies and military alliances instead of peacebuilding
dialogue and diplomacy. Since the enthusiasts in peace movements have not
changed this situation yet, we need to think about gradual transition to
universal peace, step-by-step.
After the first step, the ceasefire, commitment to nuclear neutrality could
be a value-based solution to end the war in Ukraine with universal appeal.
It was suggested in a Quaker ministry https://youtu.be/U44ijOkq7zY: “At
the summit in Rio de Janeiro, leaders of 20 biggest world economies in
their declaration committed to a world free of nuclear weapons. Indeed,
nuclear war should not happen, it would mean cities turned into radioactive
graveyards and millions of killed. I imagine how Ukraine could also commit
to a world free of nuclear weapons by joining the Treaty on the Prohibition
of Nuclear Weapons, so that even if Ukraine were to join NATO, there would
be no nuclear weapons and no nuclear drills in Ukrainian territory”.
Current State parties to the TPNW and peace movements could propose nuclear
neutrality for Ukraine and tolerance of nuclear neutrality in NATO as a way
to reconcile with Russia. They could remind NATO allies and rivals about
their obligations to make good-faith efforts for complete nuclear
disarmament according to Article VI of Non-Proliferation Treaty, and insist
that the Nuclear Club must stop threatening the world with nuclear
apocalypse, ironically for the sake of so-called security.
If NATO will allow members to be parties to TPNW, not only Ukraine but also
traditionally peaceful countries like Sweden, Norway, and Finland might
consider nuclear neutrality within NATO, decreasing risks of nuclear war,
or any war, in Europe.
Russia already tolerates nuclear neutrality of allies and partners like
Kazakhstan (a member of Russia-led Collective Security Treaty Organization)
and Mongolia, so, it would be proportional for NATO countries to adopt the
same policy.
Apart from direct damage from Russian aggression against Ukraine, there are
also anti-democratic tendencies and exaggerated mutual allegations in
sowing ethnic hatred to the enemy through the official propaganda both in
Russia and Ukraine. Though this similarity between the aggressor and the
victim is no excuse for Russian aggression, it seems that some sort of
peaceful transformations in both societies is needed for genuine
reconciliation in the future. Both knowledge and faith could be helpful on
that way of transformations.
Ukrainian Quakers (the Meeting of Friends of Ukraine) and other pacifists
hope that mainstream churches shamelessly blessing war and militarism could
be turned to light with a time by spreading peaceful religious worldviews
and secular humanist pacifism.
We launched in Ukraine the School of Pacifism Free Civilians
https://www.civilni.media/76/ educating people about nature and practices
of genuine peace, and when this project will be developed enough, we have
plans to assist Russian friends in the creation of a similar school.
The Ukrainian Pacifist Movement, as an affiliate of World BEYOND War, will
continue to contribute to peace education efforts of our worldwide network
aimed at abolition of all wars.
--
Has recibido este mensaje porque estás suscrito al grupo "delas" de Grupos
de Google.
Para cancelar la suscripción a este grupo y dejar de recibir sus mensajes,
envía un correo electrónico a delas+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Para ver este debate, visita
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/delas/CAAVvwQ7MkQGzPOcdy3ESwiC6qkBnQ2h0ACi...
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/delas/CAAVvwQ7MkQGzPOcdy3ESwiC6qkBnQ2h0ACitWGz0of8F%3Di72Tw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
.
